The First Purview AMA of 2025 is Now On-Demand
The Microsoft Purview Community has kicked off a new year picking the brains of subject matter experts to understand all that Purview can do for their data security, governance, and compliance. The panelists: Maxime Bombardier - Purview Data Security and Horizontals Sandeep Shah - Purview Data Governance Peter Oguntoye - Purview Compliance A sampling of the questions: When will we see integration between the container sensitivity labels (groups and sites) and item sensitivity labels (files and emails)? Is there a matrix to see what capabilities in Purview can be used with which license? In Purview Activity Explorers, is there a way to save custom filters? There are the built-in filters, and then you can add additional filters, but never see an option to save. If not possible, is this a future enhancement coming? What is your advice on sharing confidential information with external users and the use of Information Protection labeling? I mean, do you recommend adding external users as guest users, or using a label configured with 'Any Authenticated Users' instead? If a large enterprise customer sees many false positives returned from trainable classifiers like profanity, how can they train or recreate these to more effectively use communication compliance The rest of the questions can be found in this post; even those that didn't make it to the live AMA are answered. Here is the full Jan 8th Purview AMA Recording: And finally, please comment below- what kind of content would you like to see from Purview experts or your fellow community members/users in the future? Thank you for engaging with the Purview Community!Protecting Public Data and Trust with Azure Security and Microsoft Entra – A State DOJ Case
On June 27, 2022 - California Department of Justice launched a new Firearms Dashboard Portal with altruistic intentions to “improve transparency and information sharing for firearms-related data” and “balance its duties to provide gun violence and firearms data to support research efforts while protecting the personal identifying information in the data the Department collects and maintains”. Fast forward less than 30 days, the Attorney General’s office is now being sued by two different parties, a national non-profit on July 1 and a group of four CA citizens on July 18 respectively. Both lawsuits are predicated on the assumption that the bold text was not upheld. The CA DOJ and the CA Attorney General are not alone in facing the three pressures that incited this particular incident. Citizens want greater transparency when it comes to community health data, criminal activity, and other politically impacted domains like firearm ownership. This data comes in many forms (databases, video footage, internal reports/memos, court documents, etc.) and resides on a broad array of digital locations. This data is of special interest to hackers looking to leverage Personal Identifiable Information (PII) for financial gain OR hacktivists desiring to expose a particular truth or perceived truth by leaking the information to the broader public.
